<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 341 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751160</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee against the Ld. CIT(A)-NFAC, Delhi, for the AY 2014-15 concerning the addition of Rs. 46,52,400/- as share premium to the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal found that the AO incorrectly valued the shares, ignoring the valuation report from a registered valuer. It directed the AO to delete the addition, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to proper valuation methods and recognizing the validity of reports from registered valuers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 08:22:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 341 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751160</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee against the Ld. CIT(A)-NFAC, Delhi, for the AY 2014-15 concerning the addition of Rs. 46,52,400/- as share premium to the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal found that the AO incorrectly valued the shares, ignoring the valuation report from a registered valuer. It directed the AO to delete the addition, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to proper valuation methods and recognizing the validity of reports from registered valuers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>