<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1393 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313338</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding additions under section 68 for alleged bogus share sale proceeds. Despite the AO&#039;s reliance on Investigation Directorate reports about penny stock price manipulation, the tribunal found that the assessee had legitimately purchased shares through a broker via cheque, held them for over one year, and sold them on a recognized stock exchange. The CIT(A) confirmed shares entered and exited the assessee&#039;s demat account with proper documentation. The tribunal held that without evidence of the assessee&#039;s participation in price rigging, the long-term capital gains could not be treated as unexplained cash credits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 17:11:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1393 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313338</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding additions under section 68 for alleged bogus share sale proceeds. Despite the AO&#039;s reliance on Investigation Directorate reports about penny stock price manipulation, the tribunal found that the assessee had legitimately purchased shares through a broker via cheque, held them for over one year, and sold them on a recognized stock exchange. The CIT(A) confirmed shares entered and exited the assessee&#039;s demat account with proper documentation. The tribunal held that without evidence of the assessee&#039;s participation in price rigging, the long-term capital gains could not be treated as unexplained cash credits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>