<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 829 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313329</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court emphasized the necessity of exhausting alternative remedies provided by the Act. The petitioner was advised to pursue available legal channels to contest the attachment, as their property rights were not immediately endangered. The interim relief previously granted was also terminated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 829 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313329</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court emphasized the necessity of exhausting alternative remedies provided by the Act. The petitioner was advised to pursue available legal channels to contest the attachment, as their property rights were not immediately endangered. The interim relief previously granted was also terminated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>