<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 25 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36398</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision favoring the assessee on the interpretation of salary accrual in India. It ruled that additional questions referred by a non-applicant should not have been considered, emphasizing adherence to proper procedures for references. The judgment clarified the process of seeking references and stressed the importance of following legal procedures in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:27:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 25 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36398</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision favoring the assessee on the interpretation of salary accrual in India. It ruled that additional questions referred by a non-applicant should not have been considered, emphasizing adherence to proper procedures for references. The judgment clarified the process of seeking references and stressed the importance of following legal procedures in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>