<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 1004 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313325</link>
    <description>Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is only a supplementary source of power and cannot be used to bypass an express statutory remedy. Where the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1954 provides a specific appellate mechanism, the court&#039;s inherent jurisdiction cannot reopen concluded surplus land proceedings, especially when the statutory appeal under Section 12 was not pursued. The analysis also notes that an order lacking reasoning and disregarding the existence of a statutory remedy cannot support invocation of inherent powers. The conclusion is that recourse to Section 151 was impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 17:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 1004 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313325</link>
      <description>Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is only a supplementary source of power and cannot be used to bypass an express statutory remedy. Where the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1954 provides a specific appellate mechanism, the court&#039;s inherent jurisdiction cannot reopen concluded surplus land proceedings, especially when the statutory appeal under Section 12 was not pursued. The analysis also notes that an order lacking reasoning and disregarding the existence of a statutory remedy cannot support invocation of inherent powers. The conclusion is that recourse to Section 151 was impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>