<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Annuls Tax Order Overlooked Precedents; Demands New Assessment on Input Tax Credit Denial.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76423</link>
    <description>Refusal to rectify the assessment order passed under Rule 142 (5) of the C.G.S.T. Rules, 2017 - denial of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The High Court found merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments, noting that the assessing authority had failed to consider relevant legal precedents and a binding Circular issued by the CBIC. Consequently, the Court set aside the order dated 30.01.2024 and directed the assessing authority to reconsider the matter and issue a fresh reasoned order by a specified deadline. Pending the fresh order, the High Court ordered the disputed demand of tax and penalty to remain in abeyance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 12:23:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 12:23:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Annuls Tax Order Overlooked Precedents; Demands New Assessment on Input Tax Credit Denial.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76423</link>
      <description>Refusal to rectify the assessment order passed under Rule 142 (5) of the C.G.S.T. Rules, 2017 - denial of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The High Court found merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments, noting that the assessing authority had failed to consider relevant legal precedents and a binding Circular issued by the CBIC. Consequently, the Court set aside the order dated 30.01.2024 and directed the assessing authority to reconsider the matter and issue a fresh reasoned order by a specified deadline. Pending the fresh order, the High Court ordered the disputed demand of tax and penalty to remain in abeyance.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 12:23:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>