<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Excludes Non-Comparable Companies from Arm&#039;s Length Price Analysis Due to Product Dissimilarity.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76418</link>
    <description>TP Adjustment - Comparable selection - determination of the arm’s length price (ALP) of international transactions - The appellant contested the inclusion of two companies, Roto Pumps Ltd. and Simmonds Marshall Ltd., as comparables due to product dissimilarity. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the exclusion of these comparables, emphasizing their dissimilar businesses compared to the appellant. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s objections regarding capacity utilization adjustment, PLI calculation, and treatment of foreign exchange gain/loss, as they became inconsequential post the exclusion of the disputed comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 11:57:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 11:57:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Excludes Non-Comparable Companies from Arm&#039;s Length Price Analysis Due to Product Dissimilarity.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76418</link>
      <description>TP Adjustment - Comparable selection - determination of the arm’s length price (ALP) of international transactions - The appellant contested the inclusion of two companies, Roto Pumps Ltd. and Simmonds Marshall Ltd., as comparables due to product dissimilarity. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the exclusion of these comparables, emphasizing their dissimilar businesses compared to the appellant. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s objections regarding capacity utilization adjustment, PLI calculation, and treatment of foreign exchange gain/loss, as they became inconsequential post the exclusion of the disputed comparables.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 11:57:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>