<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 24 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36392</link>
    <description>Property received by a minor on partition of ancestral Hindu undivided family property was held to be assessable in his hands according to his own status, not the source from which it was derived. Because the assessee had no family of his own and therefore did not constitute a Hindu undivided family, the property could not retain HUF character for wealth-tax purposes. The assessee was accordingly assessable as an individual, not as an HUF.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:19:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 24 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36392</link>
      <description>Property received by a minor on partition of ancestral Hindu undivided family property was held to be assessable in his hands according to his own status, not the source from which it was derived. Because the assessee had no family of his own and therefore did not constitute a Hindu undivided family, the property could not retain HUF character for wealth-tax purposes. The assessee was accordingly assessable as an individual, not as an HUF.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>