<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 294 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751113</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted in a GST prosecution where the applicant was alleged to have availed ineligible input tax credit through purchases from non-existing entities. The HC considered the nature of the allegations, the prescribed punishment, and the period of custody, and exercised discretion under Section 439 CrPC without entering into a detailed examination of the evidence. Bail was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 294 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751113</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted in a GST prosecution where the applicant was alleged to have availed ineligible input tax credit through purchases from non-existing entities. The HC considered the nature of the allegations, the prescribed punishment, and the period of custody, and exercised discretion under Section 439 CrPC without entering into a detailed examination of the evidence. Bail was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>