<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 12 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36388</link>
    <description>Lands settled by the deceased on his minor son were treated as having vested in the son, so they were excluded from the estate passing on death. Property received under a will and later devolving through the deceased&#039;s paternal line was treated as ancestral in the deceased&#039;s hands, limiting estate duty inclusion to the relevant share. Cash gifts to the deceased&#039;s minor children did not attract section 10 of the E.D. Act because the donees were taken to have bona fide possession and enjoyment, while the donor&#039;s control was only in a guardian capacity. The estate duty additions were therefore rejected on all three issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:58:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 12 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36388</link>
      <description>Lands settled by the deceased on his minor son were treated as having vested in the son, so they were excluded from the estate passing on death. Property received under a will and later devolving through the deceased&#039;s paternal line was treated as ancestral in the deceased&#039;s hands, limiting estate duty inclusion to the relevant share. Cash gifts to the deceased&#039;s minor children did not attract section 10 of the E.D. Act because the donees were taken to have bona fide possession and enjoyment, while the donor&#039;s control was only in a guardian capacity. The estate duty additions were therefore rejected on all three issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>