<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 275 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751094</link>
    <description>An adverse adjudication order cannot stand where no effective personal hearing is granted before decision, because the opportunity of hearing is mandatory and forms part of natural justice. The notice here contained no date, time or venue for hearing and recorded only &quot;NA&quot;, and the revenue admitted the denial of hearing. The Court held that this breach was not cured by the existence of an alternative remedy and set aside the adjudication order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 275 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751094</link>
      <description>An adverse adjudication order cannot stand where no effective personal hearing is granted before decision, because the opportunity of hearing is mandatory and forms part of natural justice. The notice here contained no date, time or venue for hearing and recorded only &quot;NA&quot;, and the revenue admitted the denial of hearing. The Court held that this breach was not cured by the existence of an alternative remedy and set aside the adjudication order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>