https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751092 Assessment orders passed without affording the taxpayer a final hearing were vulnerable for breach of natural justice, even though the record showed limited participation during the proceedings. The Madras HC therefore quashed the orders and remanded the matters for fresh consideration, enabling the taxpayer to file a reply and be heard again. The remand was made conditional on deposit of 12.5% of the disputed tax demand in each order and compliance with the prescribed time limits for reply and re-adjudication. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751092 Assessment orders passed without affording the taxpayer a final hearing were vulnerable for breach of natural justice, even though the record showed limited participation during the proceedings. The Madras HC therefore quashed the orders and remanded the matters for fresh consideration, enabling the taxpayer to file a reply and be heard again. The remand was made conditional on deposit of 12.5% of the disputed tax demand in each order and compliance with the prescribed time limits for reply and re-adjudication. Case-Laws GST Wed, 28 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751092