<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 249 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751068</link>
    <description>The HC directed the petitioners to file statutory appeals within ten days regarding the impugned detention and confiscation orders. The appellate authority was instructed to consider the appeals on merit, disregarding the question of limitation. The court allowed respondents to proceed with adjudication per the detention orders, without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 249 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751068</link>
      <description>The HC directed the petitioners to file statutory appeals within ten days regarding the impugned detention and confiscation orders. The appellate authority was instructed to consider the appeals on merit, disregarding the question of limitation. The court allowed respondents to proceed with adjudication per the detention orders, without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>