https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751052 CESTAT Ahmedabad held that services involving temporary workers performing specific tasks like inspection, loading, dispatch, production and sorting at factory premises do not constitute Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service. The tribunal determined that since payment was based on per kg of goods manufactured rather than manpower provision, the agreement was for work execution, not manpower supply. Following precedent from a similar case, the tribunal ruled the classification was incorrect and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. en-us Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Apr 2024 16:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751052 CESTAT Ahmedabad held that services involving temporary workers performing specific tasks like inspection, loading, dispatch, production and sorting at factory premises do not constitute Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service. The tribunal determined that since payment was based on per kg of goods manufactured rather than manpower provision, the agreement was for work execution, not manpower supply. Following precedent from a similar case, the tribunal ruled the classification was incorrect and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751052