https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313317 The petitioner requested a three-month extension of interim bail due to a knee injury requiring surgery, following previous extensions. The ED opposed the request, citing concerns over prolonged bail. The HC denied further extension, ordering hospitalization until discharge with restricted phone use and visitation. AIIMS was tasked with verifying medical documents, allowing the petitioner to seek bail extension based on AIIMS' medical opinion. This decision underscores the balance between the right to medical treatment and preventing misuse of interim bail extensions. en-us Fri, 01 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2024 05:28:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313317 The petitioner requested a three-month extension of interim bail due to a knee injury requiring surgery, following previous extensions. The ED opposed the request, citing concerns over prolonged bail. The HC denied further extension, ordering hospitalization until discharge with restricted phone use and visitation. AIIMS was tasked with verifying medical documents, allowing the petitioner to seek bail extension based on AIIMS' medical opinion. This decision underscores the balance between the right to medical treatment and preventing misuse of interim bail extensions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 01 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313317