<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1453 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313314</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on multiple tax issues for the assessee. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of interest disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) on CWIP, finding sufficient interest-free funds available. For foreign commission expenses, the matter was restored to AO for fresh consideration due to lack of proper examination of agreements. The tribunal confirmed deletion of warranty liability provision as reasonable and scientifically based. Interest disallowance on business advances was deleted as advances were made from own funds. Section 14A disallowance was restricted to exempt dividend income amount. Overall, most issues were decided favoring the assessee except foreign commission matters requiring re-examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 05:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1453 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313314</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on multiple tax issues for the assessee. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of interest disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) on CWIP, finding sufficient interest-free funds available. For foreign commission expenses, the matter was restored to AO for fresh consideration due to lack of proper examination of agreements. The tribunal confirmed deletion of warranty liability provision as reasonable and scientifically based. Interest disallowance on business advances was deleted as advances were made from own funds. Section 14A disallowance was restricted to exempt dividend income amount. Overall, most issues were decided favoring the assessee except foreign commission matters requiring re-examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>