<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (8) TMI 64 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36376</link>
    <description>Section 23A was applied on a prudent-businessman basis, requiring the taxing authority to consider liabilities and risks intrinsically arising from concealed income when assessing distributable surplus. Penalties relatable to that concealed income were treated as real commercial hazards, so they could not be ignored merely because the penalties were imposed later. Concealed receipts were also not excluded from the surplus inquiry simply because they were undisclosed; they had to be assessed together with the attendant liabilities in determining what was commercially available for dividend distribution. On that approach, the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:36:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (8) TMI 64 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36376</link>
      <description>Section 23A was applied on a prudent-businessman basis, requiring the taxing authority to consider liabilities and risks intrinsically arising from concealed income when assessing distributable surplus. Penalties relatable to that concealed income were treated as real commercial hazards, so they could not be ignored merely because the penalties were imposed later. Concealed receipts were also not excluded from the surplus inquiry simply because they were undisclosed; they had to be assessed together with the attendant liabilities in determining what was commercially available for dividend distribution. On that approach, the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>