<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 189 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751008</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata held that an assessment order passed under section 143(3) was non-est as it got abated due to search proceedings under section 153A. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as infructuous. For the assessee&#039;s appeal, the tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s direction for recomputing disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D, confirming it applies only to investments yielding dividend income. The tribunal allowed upward adjustment to book profit under section 115JB for the disallowance. However, transfer pricing adjustments were deleted as the AO lacked jurisdiction without TPO reference, and the underlying assessment was non-est.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 189 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751008</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata held that an assessment order passed under section 143(3) was non-est as it got abated due to search proceedings under section 153A. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as infructuous. For the assessee&#039;s appeal, the tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s direction for recomputing disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D, confirming it applies only to investments yielding dividend income. The tribunal allowed upward adjustment to book profit under section 115JB for the disallowance. However, transfer pricing adjustments were deleted as the AO lacked jurisdiction without TPO reference, and the underlying assessment was non-est.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=751008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>