<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 175 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750994</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeal challenging rejection of Section 9 IBC application. Tribunal held appellant travel agent and respondent company had operational creditor-corporate debtor relationship based on credit card ticket issuance arrangements and undertakings for debit notes. However, pre-existing dispute existed as respondent disputed demand notice dated 22.08.2018 through reply on 08.09.2018, with police complaints and criminal case pending. Court found dispute was plausible, not spurious or hypothetical. Since Section 9 requires undisputed debt and pre-existing dispute prevented CIRP initiation, Adjudicating Authority correctly rejected application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 09:53:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 175 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750994</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeal challenging rejection of Section 9 IBC application. Tribunal held appellant travel agent and respondent company had operational creditor-corporate debtor relationship based on credit card ticket issuance arrangements and undertakings for debit notes. However, pre-existing dispute existed as respondent disputed demand notice dated 22.08.2018 through reply on 08.09.2018, with police complaints and criminal case pending. Court found dispute was plausible, not spurious or hypothetical. Since Section 9 requires undisputed debt and pre-existing dispute prevented CIRP initiation, Adjudicating Authority correctly rejected application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>