<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 172 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750991</link>
    <description>CESTAT Allahabad addressed service tax liability on advance payments received by a consulting engineer for government projects. The appellant failed to pay service tax when due under Point of Taxation Rules 2011, despite receiving advance payments without issuing invoices. However, service tax was paid upon project completion and invoice issuance. The tribunal found no evidence of short/non-payment of total service tax liability. Without proper reconciliation between advance payments and final invoices to determine actual tax shortfall, no additional demand could be sustained. Matter remanded to Original Adjudicating Authority for specific findings on reconciliation. Appeal allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 172 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750991</link>
      <description>CESTAT Allahabad addressed service tax liability on advance payments received by a consulting engineer for government projects. The appellant failed to pay service tax when due under Point of Taxation Rules 2011, despite receiving advance payments without issuing invoices. However, service tax was paid upon project completion and invoice issuance. The tribunal found no evidence of short/non-payment of total service tax liability. Without proper reconciliation between advance payments and final invoices to determine actual tax shortfall, no additional demand could be sustained. Matter remanded to Original Adjudicating Authority for specific findings on reconciliation. Appeal allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>