https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313276 The civil revision application was partly allowed, with the suit returned to the trial court for further proceedings. The court affirmed its pecuniary jurisdiction and maintained the suit's validity, granting necessary leave under Order 2, Rule 4 of the CPC. Plaintiffs were entitled to maintain the suit, and notices under Section 80 of the CPC were deemed valid. The suit was not dismissed but stayed, directing plaintiffs to seek a declaration from charity authorities regarding the property's trust status. Costs of the civil revision application were to follow the suit's final outcome. en-us Thu, 21 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Apr 2024 17:00:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313276 The civil revision application was partly allowed, with the suit returned to the trial court for further proceedings. The court affirmed its pecuniary jurisdiction and maintained the suit's validity, granting necessary leave under Order 2, Rule 4 of the CPC. Plaintiffs were entitled to maintain the suit, and notices under Section 80 of the CPC were deemed valid. The suit was not dismissed but stayed, directing plaintiffs to seek a declaration from charity authorities regarding the property's trust status. Costs of the civil revision application were to follow the suit's final outcome. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313276