<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 375 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313273</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the HC and trial court judgments, and dismissed the eviction suit. It determined the appellant complied with Section 20(4) of the U.P. Urban Buildings Act before the first hearing date, warranting relief from eviction. The court also proposed a rent increase, subject to agreement or statutory determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 17:00:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 375 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313273</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the HC and trial court judgments, and dismissed the eviction suit. It determined the appellant complied with Section 20(4) of the U.P. Urban Buildings Act before the first hearing date, warranting relief from eviction. The court also proposed a rent increase, subject to agreement or statutory determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>