<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1251 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313271</link>
    <description>Unconditional acceptance of a migration package barred the appellant from reopening disputes over pre-migration subscriber computation, because a party cannot retain package benefits while rejecting its burdens. Interest on unpaid licence fee was recoverable only to the limited extent accepted in the Tribunal&#039;s reasoning for the earlier unpaid period, while the clause on per-subscriber licence fee did not permit downward revision based on a reduction in unit call rate and, in any event, no supporting evidence was shown. Penal interest on overdue licence dues was also upheld, with simple interest serving as the enforcement mechanism for default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 10:04:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1251 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313271</link>
      <description>Unconditional acceptance of a migration package barred the appellant from reopening disputes over pre-migration subscriber computation, because a party cannot retain package benefits while rejecting its burdens. Interest on unpaid licence fee was recoverable only to the limited extent accepted in the Tribunal&#039;s reasoning for the earlier unpaid period, while the clause on per-subscriber licence fee did not permit downward revision based on a reduction in unit call rate and, in any event, no supporting evidence was shown. Penal interest on overdue licence dues was also upheld, with simple interest serving as the enforcement mechanism for default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>