<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1251 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313271</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed without costs. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were upheld by the Court, affirming the methodology for calculating subscribers using IMSI in the Home Location Register and the recovery of licence fees with interest. The appellant&#039;s acceptance of the Migration Package precluded disputes on pre-migration issues. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the Licence Agreement clauses regarding unit call rate revision and penal interest levy was upheld, allowing simple interest on overdue licence fees to maintain validity. The appellant did not challenge these findings, and the Court found no grounds for interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 10:04:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1251 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313271</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed without costs. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were upheld by the Court, affirming the methodology for calculating subscribers using IMSI in the Home Location Register and the recovery of licence fees with interest. The appellant&#039;s acceptance of the Migration Package precluded disputes on pre-migration issues. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the Licence Agreement clauses regarding unit call rate revision and penal interest levy was upheld, allowing simple interest on overdue licence fees to maintain validity. The appellant did not challenge these findings, and the Court found no grounds for interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>