<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 154 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750973</link>
    <description>HC examined a GST registration cancellation case involving retrospective cancellation under Section 29(2)(e). The court found the cancellation order lacking substantive justification and procedural fairness. HC set aside the retrospective cancellation, restored the petitioner&#039;s GST registration, and directed compliance with tax regulations while allowing respondents to pursue lawful tax recovery measures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 154 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750973</link>
      <description>HC examined a GST registration cancellation case involving retrospective cancellation under Section 29(2)(e). The court found the cancellation order lacking substantive justification and procedural fairness. HC set aside the retrospective cancellation, restored the petitioner&#039;s GST registration, and directed compliance with tax regulations while allowing respondents to pursue lawful tax recovery measures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>