<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (1) TMI 64 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36361</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the entire amount claimed for deduction of initial contribution towards gratuity under the approved scheme for the assessment year 1964-65. The Court held that the contribution did not exceed the prescribed limit set by Rule 104, which specifies a maximum limit of 8 1/3% of the employee&#039;s salary for each year of past service. Additionally, the Court affirmed that any excess contribution made by the assessee for business purposes is allowable under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:12:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (1) TMI 64 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36361</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the entire amount claimed for deduction of initial contribution towards gratuity under the approved scheme for the assessment year 1964-65. The Court held that the contribution did not exceed the prescribed limit set by Rule 104, which specifies a maximum limit of 8 1/3% of the employee&#039;s salary for each year of past service. Additionally, the Court affirmed that any excess contribution made by the assessee for business purposes is allowable under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>