<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 141 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750960</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, affirming the directions for fresh adjudication by the TPO regarding the transfer pricing adjustment. The court found no substantial question of law in the appeal concerning capacity utilization adjustments and compliance with Rule 10B(1)(e)(iii) of the IT Rules, 1962, thereby dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:20:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 141 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750960</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, affirming the directions for fresh adjudication by the TPO regarding the transfer pricing adjustment. The court found no substantial question of law in the appeal concerning capacity utilization adjustments and compliance with Rule 10B(1)(e)(iii) of the IT Rules, 1962, thereby dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>