<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Partly Allows Appeal: Credible Explanation for Real Estate Deposits, Upholds Addition for Unexplained Loan Proceeds.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76333</link>
    <description>Addition u/s. 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the sale consideration for real estate transactions to be credible, especially considering the stamp paper in the purchaser&#039;s name and the nature of the assessee&#039;s business. - However, discrepancies were noted in the explanation provided for loan proceeds, leading to the Tribunal upholding a portion of the addition as unexplained. - In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of a significant portion of the addition while upholding a portion as unexplained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:20:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:20:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Partly Allows Appeal: Credible Explanation for Real Estate Deposits, Upholds Addition for Unexplained Loan Proceeds.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76333</link>
      <description>Addition u/s. 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the sale consideration for real estate transactions to be credible, especially considering the stamp paper in the purchaser&#039;s name and the nature of the assessee&#039;s business. - However, discrepancies were noted in the explanation provided for loan proceeds, leading to the Tribunal upholding a portion of the addition as unexplained. - In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of a significant portion of the addition while upholding a portion as unexplained.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:20:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>