<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 132 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750951</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad restored multiple issues to the AO/TPO for fresh consideration after finding merit in the assessee&#039;s contentions. The tribunal directed reconsideration of TP margin computation for services provided to associated enterprises, noting that segmental operating margin rather than entity-level margin was considered. The adjustment for expatriate salary reimbursement was restored with direction for the assessee to produce the deputation agreement. Disallowance of miscellaneous expenditure as prior period/capital expenses was restored for verification of invoices and expenditure nature. The loss on projects issue was restored to DRP for verification under ICDS-III regarding construction contract accounting standards. All grounds were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:20:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 132 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750951</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad restored multiple issues to the AO/TPO for fresh consideration after finding merit in the assessee&#039;s contentions. The tribunal directed reconsideration of TP margin computation for services provided to associated enterprises, noting that segmental operating margin rather than entity-level margin was considered. The adjustment for expatriate salary reimbursement was restored with direction for the assessee to produce the deputation agreement. Disallowance of miscellaneous expenditure as prior period/capital expenses was restored for verification of invoices and expenditure nature. The loss on projects issue was restored to DRP for verification under ICDS-III regarding construction contract accounting standards. All grounds were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>