<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 122 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750941</link>
    <description>Preferential customs exemption under the AIFTA framework depends on satisfaction of the originating criteria, including prescribed value addition and tariff classification requirements, supported by a valid certificate of origin. Where the record contains certificates issued by the exporting country&#039;s authority, denial of the benefit should not rest only on intelligence inputs or an incomplete verification exercise. If the authenticity of the certificate or the exporter&#039;s manufacturing claim remains unresolved, conclusive rejection of exemption is not justified and further inquiry is required before denial and consequential duty demand are affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 122 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750941</link>
      <description>Preferential customs exemption under the AIFTA framework depends on satisfaction of the originating criteria, including prescribed value addition and tariff classification requirements, supported by a valid certificate of origin. Where the record contains certificates issued by the exporting country&#039;s authority, denial of the benefit should not rest only on intelligence inputs or an incomplete verification exercise. If the authenticity of the certificate or the exporter&#039;s manufacturing claim remains unresolved, conclusive rejection of exemption is not justified and further inquiry is required before denial and consequential duty demand are affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>