<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (12) TMI 30 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36356</link>
    <description>Gift-tax exemption under section 5(1)(viii) was available where the Tribunal found that Manickam Gupta made the gift to his wife as the real state of affairs, with no evidence to show otherwise. The decisive issue was whether he acted as husband or as karta of the Hindu undivided family; on the facts accepted, the gift of family property shares to the spouse satisfied the statutory condition for exemption. The question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:02:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (12) TMI 30 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36356</link>
      <description>Gift-tax exemption under section 5(1)(viii) was available where the Tribunal found that Manickam Gupta made the gift to his wife as the real state of affairs, with no evidence to show otherwise. The decisive issue was whether he acted as husband or as karta of the Hindu undivided family; on the facts accepted, the gift of family property shares to the spouse satisfied the statutory condition for exemption. The question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>