<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 118 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750937</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed an appeal challenging admission of a Section 7 application under IBC. The tribunal held that Rs. 5 crore disbursed to the corporate debtor constituted financial debt as it involved disbursal against consideration for time value of money, citing Supreme Court precedents in Pioneer Urban Land and Jaypee Infratech cases. The corporate debtor failed to dispute the debt or prove repayment. The adjudicating authority correctly found financial debt existence, default above threshold limit, and properly admitted the corporate debtor into CIRP process under summary jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 04:52:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=749012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 118 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750937</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed an appeal challenging admission of a Section 7 application under IBC. The tribunal held that Rs. 5 crore disbursed to the corporate debtor constituted financial debt as it involved disbursal against consideration for time value of money, citing Supreme Court precedents in Pioneer Urban Land and Jaypee Infratech cases. The corporate debtor failed to dispute the debt or prove repayment. The adjudicating authority correctly found financial debt existence, default above threshold limit, and properly admitted the corporate debtor into CIRP process under summary jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>