<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36352</link>
    <description>The Court interpreted the term &quot;migrated&quot; broadly, requiring voluntary movement from Ceylon to India for an extended period with substantial business interests in Ceylon. The assessee, having spent significant time in Ceylon and now permanently in India, was considered to have migrated from Ceylon, making him eligible for the Circular&#039;s benefits. The Court dismissed the argument that being an Indian citizen precluded the assessee from benefiting under the Circular, as the Circular itself allowed assessments for Indian citizens. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36352</link>
      <description>The Court interpreted the term &quot;migrated&quot; broadly, requiring voluntary movement from Ceylon to India for an extended period with substantial business interests in Ceylon. The assessee, having spent significant time in Ceylon and now permanently in India, was considered to have migrated from Ceylon, making him eligible for the Circular&#039;s benefits. The Court dismissed the argument that being an Indian citizen precluded the assessee from benefiting under the Circular, as the Circular itself allowed assessments for Indian citizens. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>