https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313259 Eviction under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 requires a proper application specifically seeking eviction of the tenant in possession on a pleaded ground under Section 13(2). Where non-payment of rent is invoked, the tenant must be directly called upon to meet that allegation so the statutory opportunity to pay or tender arrears within time remains available. A landlord cannot obtain an ejectment order against an impleaded person when the original case was not specifically directed against him as tenant and the real position was not properly disclosed. Relief beyond the pleaded case would prejudice statutory rights and is impermissible. en-us Fri, 30 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Apr 2024 15:45:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313259 Eviction under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 requires a proper application specifically seeking eviction of the tenant in possession on a pleaded ground under Section 13(2). Where non-payment of rent is invoked, the tenant must be directly called upon to meet that allegation so the statutory opportunity to pay or tender arrears within time remains available. A landlord cannot obtain an ejectment order against an impleaded person when the original case was not specifically directed against him as tenant and the real position was not properly disclosed. Relief beyond the pleaded case would prejudice statutory rights and is impermissible. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313259