<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (10) TMI 298 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313258</link>
    <description>Postgraduate medical admissions may be regulated strictly on academic merit where government orders and duly framed Medical Council rules prescribe merit-based selection and eligibility standards. Those norms are enforceable because they are intended to preserve educational standards and prevent admissions on extraneous considerations. Where the academic authority applies the rules bona fide and uniformly, the High Court should not substitute a different selection criterion, relax merit requirements, or direct admission contrary to the governing rules. Mandamus cannot be issued in disregard of the prescribed admission framework; judicial interference is justified only where arbitrariness, prejudice, or bias is shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 15:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (10) TMI 298 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313258</link>
      <description>Postgraduate medical admissions may be regulated strictly on academic merit where government orders and duly framed Medical Council rules prescribe merit-based selection and eligibility standards. Those norms are enforceable because they are intended to preserve educational standards and prevent admissions on extraneous considerations. Where the academic authority applies the rules bona fide and uniformly, the High Court should not substitute a different selection criterion, relax merit requirements, or direct admission contrary to the governing rules. Mandamus cannot be issued in disregard of the prescribed admission framework; judicial interference is justified only where arbitrariness, prejudice, or bias is shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>