<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1283 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313257</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction claim under Section 80(1A)(4) for an infrastructure facility set up by Cochin Port Trust. The Court determined that the term &quot;new&quot; did not exclude existing facilities, provided they were operational by the requisite date, thus dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1283 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313257</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction claim under Section 80(1A)(4) for an infrastructure facility set up by Cochin Port Trust. The Court determined that the term &quot;new&quot; did not exclude existing facilities, provided they were operational by the requisite date, thus dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>