<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 205 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313253</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petitions, affirming the validity and binding nature of new building restrictions imposed by the GOC-in-Chief and the Cantonment Board. The Court underscored the necessity of compliance with these restrictions and full payment of conversion charges for building plan approval, reinforcing regulatory authority for public interest and urban planning in Pune.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 10:53:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 205 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313253</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petitions, affirming the validity and binding nature of new building restrictions imposed by the GOC-in-Chief and the Cantonment Board. The Court underscored the necessity of compliance with these restrictions and full payment of conversion charges for building plan approval, reinforcing regulatory authority for public interest and urban planning in Pune.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>