<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Finds Error in Tax Settlement on Share Capital Infusion; Questions Department&#039;s Inconsistent Positions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76304</link>
    <description>Validity of Income Tax Settlement order - additions made with respect to the infusion of share capital and the denial of benefit of deductions u/s 80IC - second round of litigation - The Court found substantial merit in the assessee&#039;s submissions regarding the infusion of share capital. The Court concluded that the addition of INR 11.26 crores by the ITSC was unsubstantiated, especially in light of evidence suggesting the funds&#039; availability for such investment by the implicated company in the relevant assessment years. - The High Court observed a pivotal mistake in the ITSC&#039;s handling of share capital issues, particularly failing to account for the Department&#039;s contradictory stances and the non-application of Section 115BBE of the Act, which pertains to tax on income with unexplained credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 09:18:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 09:18:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Finds Error in Tax Settlement on Share Capital Infusion; Questions Department&#039;s Inconsistent Positions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76304</link>
      <description>Validity of Income Tax Settlement order - additions made with respect to the infusion of share capital and the denial of benefit of deductions u/s 80IC - second round of litigation - The Court found substantial merit in the assessee&#039;s submissions regarding the infusion of share capital. The Court concluded that the addition of INR 11.26 crores by the ITSC was unsubstantiated, especially in light of evidence suggesting the funds&#039; availability for such investment by the implicated company in the relevant assessment years. - The High Court observed a pivotal mistake in the ITSC&#039;s handling of share capital issues, particularly failing to account for the Department&#039;s contradictory stances and the non-application of Section 115BBE of the Act, which pertains to tax on income with unexplained credit.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 09:18:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>