<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SIMULTANEOUS PROCEEDINGS PERMISSIBLE UNDER TABITRATION ACT AND NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12487</link>
    <description>Arbitration and criminal proceedings for cheque dishonour under the Negotiable Instruments framework may be maintained concurrently where they arise from separate causes of action; pendency of arbitration does not bar criminal prosecution and issues such as whether the cheque was given as security are matters of defence to be determined at trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 08:05:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 08:05:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SIMULTANEOUS PROCEEDINGS PERMISSIBLE UNDER TABITRATION ACT AND NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12487</link>
      <description>Arbitration and criminal proceedings for cheque dishonour under the Negotiable Instruments framework may be maintained concurrently where they arise from separate causes of action; pendency of arbitration does not bar criminal prosecution and issues such as whether the cheque was given as security are matters of defence to be determined at trial.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 08:05:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=12487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>