<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 105 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750924</link>
    <description>HC analyzed a tax dispute involving ITC denial and appeal delay. The court condoned the 2-month and 21-day delay in filing an appeal, allowing the petitioner to challenge the tax demand after paying 15% of the disputed tax. The ruling emphasized fairness for small businesses facing procedural challenges in tax compliance, providing a pathway for the petitioner to present their case before the appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 105 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750924</link>
      <description>HC analyzed a tax dispute involving ITC denial and appeal delay. The court condoned the 2-month and 21-day delay in filing an appeal, allowing the petitioner to challenge the tax demand after paying 15% of the disputed tax. The ruling emphasized fairness for small businesses facing procedural challenges in tax compliance, providing a pathway for the petitioner to present their case before the appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>