<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 103 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750922</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging GST assessment order. Court found procedural irregularities in tax assessment, specifically lack of personal hearing despite offering documents. HC quashed the original assessment order, directing tax authorities to provide reasonable opportunity for hearing and issue a fresh assessment order within two months, with petitioner required to remit 10% of disputed tax demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 103 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750922</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of petitioner challenging GST assessment order. Court found procedural irregularities in tax assessment, specifically lack of personal hearing despite offering documents. HC quashed the original assessment order, directing tax authorities to provide reasonable opportunity for hearing and issue a fresh assessment order within two months, with petitioner required to remit 10% of disputed tax demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>