<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36344</link>
    <description>The court held that the rent received from leasing machinery and the export incentives qualify for deduction under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as they are deemed profits attributable to a priority industry. However, the interest income from bank deposits was not considered eligible for the deduction as it lacked a direct nexus with the priority industry. The court made its ruling accordingly, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:40:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36344</link>
      <description>The court held that the rent received from leasing machinery and the export incentives qualify for deduction under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as they are deemed profits attributable to a priority industry. However, the interest income from bank deposits was not considered eligible for the deduction as it lacked a direct nexus with the priority industry. The court made its ruling accordingly, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>