https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750895 Repeated non-appearance despite successive directions and express warnings justified the resort to non-bailable warrants, as lesser coercive measures had failed to secure the petitioner's physical attendance. The Court noted that the petitioner had repeatedly sought exemption from personal appearance, had not complied with directions to appear before the Trial Court, and had also failed to appear before the investigating agency during investigation. Applying the principle that non-bailable warrants may be issued when summons or milder process are unlikely to ensure attendance, the Court found no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order and declined to quash the warrants. en-us Mon, 01 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Apr 2024 06:25:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750895 Repeated non-appearance despite successive directions and express warnings justified the resort to non-bailable warrants, as lesser coercive measures had failed to secure the petitioner's physical attendance. The Court noted that the petitioner had repeatedly sought exemption from personal appearance, had not complied with directions to appear before the Trial Court, and had also failed to appear before the investigating agency during investigation. Applying the principle that non-bailable warrants may be issued when summons or milder process are unlikely to ensure attendance, the Court found no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order and declined to quash the warrants. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 01 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750895