<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Quashes Form SVLDRS 3, Orders Reissue with Hearing under Sabka Vishwas Scheme for Procedural Fairness.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76285</link>
    <description>Principles of natural justice - Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - The petitioner argued that it had already declared and paid taxes on the mentioned turnover. - The High Court found merit in the petitioner&#039;s argument that the Designated Committee violated procedural requirements by not issuing Form SVLDRS 2 and denying a personal hearing before issuing Form SVLDRS 3. - Consequently, the High Court quashed Form SVLDRS 3 and remanded the matter back to the Designated Committee. It directed the committee to issue Form SVLDRS 2 to the petitioner and provide an opportunity for a personal hearing before passing a reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 06:25:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 06:25:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Quashes Form SVLDRS 3, Orders Reissue with Hearing under Sabka Vishwas Scheme for Procedural Fairness.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76285</link>
      <description>Principles of natural justice - Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - The petitioner argued that it had already declared and paid taxes on the mentioned turnover. - The High Court found merit in the petitioner&#039;s argument that the Designated Committee violated procedural requirements by not issuing Form SVLDRS 2 and denying a personal hearing before issuing Form SVLDRS 3. - Consequently, the High Court quashed Form SVLDRS 3 and remanded the matter back to the Designated Committee. It directed the committee to issue Form SVLDRS 2 to the petitioner and provide an opportunity for a personal hearing before passing a reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 06:25:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>