<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 741 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313249</link>
    <description>The governing test is the true character of the transaction and the rights created, not the label used by the parties. A relinquishment deed is chargeable as a release deed only where a co-owner renounces an undivided interest in favour of another co-owner with a pre-existing share, so that the latter&#039;s interest is enlarged; if the recitals show a transfer of title or a unilateral benefit in favour of one co-owner, the instrument may fall within gift/conveyance treatment instead. On the first set of facts, the Delhi HC treated the deed as a valid release under Article 55. On the second, the deeds were treated as gift/conveyance instruments, but the penalty was set aside because no reasons were recorded and there was no clear intent to evade stamp duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 04:54:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 741 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313249</link>
      <description>The governing test is the true character of the transaction and the rights created, not the label used by the parties. A relinquishment deed is chargeable as a release deed only where a co-owner renounces an undivided interest in favour of another co-owner with a pre-existing share, so that the latter&#039;s interest is enlarged; if the recitals show a transfer of title or a unilateral benefit in favour of one co-owner, the instrument may fall within gift/conveyance treatment instead. On the first set of facts, the Delhi HC treated the deed as a valid release under Article 55. On the second, the deeds were treated as gift/conveyance instruments, but the penalty was set aside because no reasons were recorded and there was no clear intent to evade stamp duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>