https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313247 An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was held not maintainable because a pre-existing dispute existed before the demand notice under Section 8(1). The record showed disagreement over delay and the adequacy, quality, and timely provision of transport services by the carrier. As such, the statutory conditions for admission were not satisfied, since operational debt proceedings under Section 9 cannot proceed where a genuine prior dispute is already on record. en-us Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Apr 2024 04:54:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313247 An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was held not maintainable because a pre-existing dispute existed before the demand notice under Section 8(1). The record showed disagreement over delay and the adequacy, quality, and timely provision of transport services by the carrier. As such, the statutory conditions for admission were not satisfied, since operational debt proceedings under Section 9 cannot proceed where a genuine prior dispute is already on record. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313247