<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 57 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750876</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s writ petition challenging GST assessment and recovery orders. The court found insufficient hearing opportunity, quashed the assessment order, and lifted bank attachment. The matter was remanded for reconsideration, directing the respondent to provide a personal hearing and allowing the petitioner to submit a reply within 15 days. No costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 57 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750876</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s writ petition challenging GST assessment and recovery orders. The court found insufficient hearing opportunity, quashed the assessment order, and lifted bank attachment. The matter was remanded for reconsideration, directing the respondent to provide a personal hearing and allowing the petitioner to submit a reply within 15 days. No costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>