https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750829 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal by the appellant, a State Government Undertaking, regarding cenvat credit on input services before payment under Rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal found no restriction on availing cenvat credit, referencing a prior decision. It determined that the extended period of limitation did not apply, and interest might be payable for the intervening period. Consequently, the appellant was entitled to cenvat credit, and any consequential relief was granted. en-us Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Apr 2024 19:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750829 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal by the appellant, a State Government Undertaking, regarding cenvat credit on input services before payment under Rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal found no restriction on availing cenvat credit, referencing a prior decision. It determined that the extended period of limitation did not apply, and interest might be payable for the intervening period. Consequently, the appellant was entitled to cenvat credit, and any consequential relief was granted. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750829