<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 9 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750828</link>
    <description>Service tax on directors&#039; remuneration under reverse charge was treated as settled by prior tribunal rulings construing Sl. No. 5A of Notification No. 30/2012-ST. On that basis, the challenge by the Revenue was found to have no merit, as the same question had already been answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. The operative result was that directors&#039; remuneration was not subjected to service tax under the reverse charge mechanism on the facts considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 18:58:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 9 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750828</link>
      <description>Service tax on directors&#039; remuneration under reverse charge was treated as settled by prior tribunal rulings construing Sl. No. 5A of Notification No. 30/2012-ST. On that basis, the challenge by the Revenue was found to have no merit, as the same question had already been answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. The operative result was that directors&#039; remuneration was not subjected to service tax under the reverse charge mechanism on the facts considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>