https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750826 The appeal under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the CESTAT's order, was rejected. The Tribunal's decision, which allowed the assessee's appeal by declaring Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 as unconstitutional, was upheld. No substantial question of law warranted interference. No costs were awarded, and pending miscellaneous applications were closed. en-us Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Apr 2024 18:58:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750826 The appeal under Section 35H of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the CESTAT's order, was rejected. The Tribunal's decision, which allowed the assessee's appeal by declaring Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 as unconstitutional, was upheld. No substantial question of law warranted interference. No costs were awarded, and pending miscellaneous applications were closed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750826