<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750820</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petition seeking to quash a complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act, filed by the respondent company. The Court held that arbitration proceedings do not preclude the maintainability of a Section 138 NI Act complaint. The argument that the complaint is invalid due to ongoing arbitration was rejected, and all pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750820</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petition seeking to quash a complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act, filed by the respondent company. The Court held that arbitration proceedings do not preclude the maintainability of a Section 138 NI Act complaint. The argument that the complaint is invalid due to ongoing arbitration was rejected, and all pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=750820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>